Evaluation Methods Of Clinical Situations

Discussion: Evaluation Methods of Clinical Situations Last week, your focus was evaluation and strategies at the learner level. This week, you will consider the purpose of evaluation and set of strategies for the course or learning experience level.

These include conceptual models like the Structure, Process, and Outcome model for healthcare, and the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) educational model. As you examine these and other evaluation methods, reflect on how outcomes and objectives continue to play a strategic role in the evaluation process, whether at the learner or course/learning experience level.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Evaluation Methods Of Clinical Situations
From $8/Page
Order Essay

Photo Credit: Jacob Lund/Adobe Stock In this Discussion, you will consider course/learning experience level learning outcomes within each domain of learning and explain which course/learning experience level evaluation method or strategy would be most appropriate. You will also keep in mind that different Discussion groups and settings would impact the methods you choose. Note: Remember that your Instructor assigned you to a specific Discussion Group A, B, C, or D in Week 2. You will remain in the same group and respond from the perspective of your Discussion group setting. To Prepare: Based on your Discussion group setting, consider a professional practice scenario in that setting for which you could develop end-of-course/learning experience outcomes.

Develop one course/learning experience level learning outcome from each domain of learning, and use higher Bloom’s levels of learning (i.e., application level or above). Provide a type of evaluation method to be used for each course/learning experience level learning outcome. By Day 3 of Week 10 In your Group Discussion area, post the following: Briefly describe your practice scenario for the Discussion group setting and the needed learning. 

Describe your course/learning experience level learning outcome from each domain and explain the type of evaluation method.

Explain why course/learning experience level evaluation methods might vary based on your Discussion group setting.

Explain how course/learning experience level methods might vary based on the healthcare setting. Use the Learning Resources and/or the best available evidence from current literature to support your post. Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Week 10 Respond to colleagues in your group on at least two different days by explaining whether colleagues’ evaluation methods were appropriate for the course/learning experience level outcomes presented. Propose different methods of evaluation for the learning outcomes and support your reasoning with the Learning Resources and/or the best available evidence from current literature. Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! Submission and Grading Information Grading Criteria To access your rubric: Rubric Detail   Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6321_Week10_Discussion_Rubric Grid View List View   Excellent Good Fair Poor Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Respond to the discussion question(s) and are reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. It somewhat lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

The post is cited from two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by Day 3. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post main post by Day 3. First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered if posed.

The response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

The response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed.

The response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on-topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered if posed.

The response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. The response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed. The response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on-topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) N/A 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6321_Week10_Discussion_Rubric Learning Resources Required Readings (click to expand/reduce) Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2020). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. Chapter 23, “Introduction to the Evaluation Process” (pp. 437–449) Keating, S. B. (2018). The classic components of the curriculum: Developing a curriculum plan. In Keating, S. B., & DeBoor, S. S. (Eds.), Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing education (4th ed., pp. 81–101). New York, NY: Springer (Previously read in Weeks 4, 5, 6, and 8) Credit Line: Curriculum Development and Evaluation in Nursing Education, 4th Edition by Sarah B. Keating & Stephanie S. DeBoor, Editors. Copyright 2018 by Springer Publishing Company. Reprinted by permission of Springer Publishing Company via the Copyright Clearance Center. Keating, S. B. (2018). Program evaluation and accreditation. In Keating, S. B., & DeBoor, S. S. (Eds.), Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing education (4th ed., pp. 204–219). New York, NY: Springer. (Previously read in Week 2) Credit Line: Curriculum Development and Evaluation in Nursing Education, 4th Edition by Sarah B. Keating & Stephanie S. DeBoor, Editors. Copyright 2018 by Springer Publishing Company. Reprinted by permission of Springer Publishing Company via the Copyright Clearance Center. Dickerson, P. S., Shinners, J., & Chappell, K. (2017). Awarding credit for outcomes-based professional development. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 48(3), 97-98. The following documents are from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Review these documents as to how the Program Evaluation framework is conducted within the CDC.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Program Performance and Evaluation Office. (2018). CDC program evaluation framework. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018a).

Checklist for

Step 1: Engage stakeholders. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/eval/steps/step1/Step-1-Checklist-Final.pdf Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018b). Checklist for Step 2: Describe the program. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/eval/steps/step2/

Step-2-Checklist-Final.pdf Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018c). Checklist for Step 3: Focus on the evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/eval/steps/step3/

Step-3-Checklist-Final.pdf Ratka, A., Zorek, J. A., & Meyer, S. M. (2017). Overview of faculty development programs for interprofessional education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(5), 1–10. Rutherford-Hemming, T., & Lioce, L. (2018). State of interprofessional education in nursing: A systematic review. Nurse Educator, 43(1), 9–13. Document: Learning Objective Verbs at Each Bloom’s Taxonomy Level (PDF document) (Previously reviewed in Weeks 7 and 8) Document: Part 4 Planning Guide: Evaluation Plan Home Care or Public Health Agency (Word document) Document: Part 4 Planning Guide: Evaluation Plan College or University (Word document) Document: Part 4 Planning Guide: Evaluation Plan Medical/Health Center (Word document) Document: Part 4 Planning Guide: Evaluation Plan Other Setting (Clinic, etc.) (Word document)

Discussion: Evaluation Methods of Clinical Situations Last week, your focus was evaluation and strategies at the learner level. This week, you will consider the purpose of evaluation and set of strategies for the course or learning experience level. These include conceptual models like the Structure, Process, and Outcome model for healthcare, and the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) educational model. As you examine these and other evaluation methods, reflect on how outcomes and objectives continue to play a strategic role in the evaluation process, whether at the learner or course/learning experience level.

Photo Credit: Jacob Lund/Adobe Stock In this Discussion, you will consider course/learning experience level learning outcomes within each domain of learning and explain which course/learning experience level evaluation method or strategy would be most appropriate. You will also keep in mind that different Discussion groups and settings would impact the methods you choose.

Note: Remember that your Instructor assigned you to a specific Discussion Group A, B, C, or D in Week 2. You will remain in the same group and respond from the perspective of your Discussion group setting.

Essay Writer 4me
Order NOW For A 10% Discount!
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

An important research paper due imminently? We have your back! Simply request help from an expert whose expertise is verified. We employ Bachelor's, Master's, and Ph.D. graduates with years of expertise in the industry of professional writing. Before they begin writing for us, we verify their credentials and conduct assessments to ensure they can consistently provide the highest quality content. Before submission, your research article will also be examined by the quality control team.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We firmly believe that all of our clients deserve to excel in both their academic careers and, in the future, their professional life, and we are glad to assist them in achieving that goal. We have curated a team of subject-oriented academic writers who have been carefully selected to ensure that we deliver the best quality papers you can expect from a professional writer. Writing essays, completing extensive research, and performing complex calculations are all areas of expertise for every one of our specialists. They have a lot of experience in their industries. They are capable of completing any writing assignment within the allotted time limit. They enjoy what they do and are always striving to better their knowledge and abilities in research and writing. Contact us to hire our academic help services at the drop of a hat.

Free Unlimited Revisions

Our primary goal is to ensure our customers are delighted; therefore, we endeavor to offer an excellent service. Essaywriter4me's revision policy allows customers to receive free changes within ten days of the due date. You can request a free revision of your order if you believe we made a mistake. Log in to your personal account.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

Are you having trouble completing your MBA project case studies and assignments? Due to a lack of time, are you unable to research? In need of a company that provides high-quality custom writing services at reasonable prices? Contact Essaywriter4me and get Take the help of a professional assignment help writer. The length, difficulty, and deadline all factor into how much time it takes to prepare and polish an essay. Completing technical assignments sometimes takes longer than expected. On the other hand, our writers and supervisors will do everything in their power to meet your deadlines. We can produce a finished article within four hours without sacrificing quality.

Original & Confidential

We check online first. Second, we examine our database of completed orders to ensure that you always receive original content. Every assignment is written from scratch by Essaywriter4me writers and double-checked with our plagiarism detection software. We never send pre-written essays or papers that include copied content. This originality report is available upon request, providing you full trust in the quality of our writing. We guarantee that all information provided or shared with us will remain confidential since we never share it with a third party. You are not concerned about what will happen to the data. PayPal and the bank protect your funds, so there is no risk of fraud or deception. Students love us due to our stringent confidentiality policies. Whatever occurs here is strictly confidential between you and us.

Customer Support 24/7

We have a team of dedicated customer care representatives eager to help you with the best-suited assignment help services, each of which is tailored to each client's unique needs. You can contact them via email, phone, or live chat if you need help with a particular subject. At Essaywriter4me, you'll have access to an expert 24 hours a day, seven days a week! Our expert writers are also available around the clock, no matter the time of the day or night. Choose between scheduling a tutoring session or getting immediate help when you need it most. We always have experts available to work around your schedule, no matter what time of day!

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Services

Hire an assignment writing expert to get a well-written project before the deadline. Request "write my essay" today. Our academic writers have worked in this field for years; they are familiar with the most common formatting standards. These include but are not limited to MLA, APA, Harvard, and Chicago/Turabian formats.

Our writers are chosen from a pool of qualified candidates, with just the top two percent gaining employment with our paper writing service. This implies that every writer you hire will be eager to discuss your needs and construct a flawless paper that leaves you entirely satisfied. Start by placing an order, or contact customer service for additional information about our experts.

Admissions

Admission and Business Papers

Applying to college or university requires much effort and accountability. Every applicant should persuade the admissions committee with their reasons for pursuing a degree in a particular program. Please familiarize yourself with why an application essay writing service is an excellent choice for you.

Our admission essay writing service will help you effectively present yourself. It is hard to find legit online expert college application essay writers. At our service, we offer high-quality cooperation based on extensive experience and a strict confidentiality policy. The price per page varies depending on the writer's experience and the urgency of the job. Therefore, you can request, "Please write my application essay," and find the best available writer.

Editing

Editing and Proofreading

We are an award-winning group of talented editors and reviewers serving over 10 thousand clients in 100 countries. Exclusively for professors, lecturers, post-doctoral researchers, research students, and commercial clients, Essaywriter4me offers professional academic proofreading and English language editing services. Our objective is to address the increasing demand for English-language services among academics and business people worldwide.

We specialize in academic proofreading and English language editing for authors of dissertations, Doctoral dissertations, journal articles, books, journal articles, essays, and other professional documents, such as research projects, in the Social Sciences, the Sciences, and the Humanities.

Coursework

Revision Support

If you believe your paper needs some modification, you can request a review. Our specialist writers are familiar with all academic formats, including MLA, APA, CSE, and Chicago. We collaborate to improve your writing. If you didn't start your paper the night before, you've come to the proper place. Our academic revision service is available 24/7. Simply place your order now.